Archive for July, 2008

What “Patient Counseling” is Worth

Thursday, July 31st, 2008


Effective Jan 1, 2008, there are two codes that doctors can use for “Smoking and tobacco use cessation counseling visit: intermediate, up to ten minutes (99406)” and “greater than 10 minutes (99407)”. The reimbursement for 99406 is $11.96 and for 99407 it is $23.55.
(Yes, you saw those numbers correctly. I can’t wait to get my check for $11.96)

Welcome to the world of Primary Care.

Smoking is one of the most detrimental of bad health habits and it costs each American $630 a year in federal and state taxes for the public health of smoking related problems. A pack of cigarettes costs $4.49 and a 40-year-old who quits smoking and puts the savings into a 401(k) earning 9% a year would have nearly $250,000 by age 70. So how much is primary care counseling really worth to society?

Why is something that should be valued…helping patients quit smoking…reimbursed pennies, yet a CT of the lung to check for cancer can be reimbursed over $2,000.00. Add on pulmonary consults, PET scans, follow up CTs, and Chest X-rays to evaluate a lung nodule and you can be up to $25,000 in no time at all. That is all just “screening”…not even a diagnosis or treatment.

What does this tell us? Primary care is dead in the United States and our health system is imploding with misaligned incentives and payments. The $11.96 that Medicare pays a primary care physician will buy 2 packs of cigarettes with change left over for a donut.

Viagra - New Uses

Monday, July 28th, 2008


In one week we heard of two new ways that Viagra is being used for more than male erectile dysfunction (ED).

First the story came from the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA). Researchers looked at women who had sexual dysfunction from taking antidepressants. Up to 70% of women who take antidepressants loose interest in sex or have difficulty having an orgasm. The average age in this study was 37 and they found that 72% of women who were given Viagra before sexual activity said they had improvement in sexual function compared with 27% in the placebo group.

It should be noted that Viagra doesn’t do anything for womens sexual desire or libido. And it doesn’t work for everyone , but for the subset of women whose sexuality changed after being on antidepressants, it might be worth a try.

The 2nd new use for Viagra is to treat babies who are born with pulmonary hypertension. Because Viagra allows more blood to flow to lung vessels, it improved symptoms for these babies and allowed one to be weaned from ventilator.

Isn’t modern science wonderful?

Answer to Medical Challenge

Saturday, July 26th, 2008

The answer to the tongue below is #2 - Celiac Disease.

This tongue shows atrophic glossitis. Notice that the taste buds (papillae) in the center of the tongue are gone. This is most often associated with vitamin deficiency like folic acid and vitamin B. Celiac Disease causes inability to absorb certain vitamins in the gut and pernicious anemia is often the result.

In third-world countries where protein calorie malnutrition is present, atrophic glossitis is very common.

This Weeks Medical Challenge

Friday, July 25th, 2008

This weeks challenge will be difficult for non-physicians but physicians should know it. Either way you may learn something interesting. The image is a tongue. (click for better view). What is the most likely diagnosis?
1. Amyloidosis
2. Celiac disease
3. Hypothyroidism
4. Kawasaki disease
5. Type 2 diabetes
Have fun and I’ll post the answer tomorrow!

More Laughter is Healthy

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

A walker noticed an old lady sitting on her front step, so he walked up to her and said, “I couldn’t help noticing how happy you look! What is your secret?”

“I smoke ten cigars a day,’ she said. ‘ Before I go to bed I smoke a few cigarettes, and I like to drink a whole bottle of Jack Daniels each week. I eat lots of fast food and on weekends I pop pills. I never exercise.”

“That’s absolutely amazing! How old are you?”

“Twenty-four”, she replied.

(Hat tip to Ray B)

Laughter is Healthy

Thursday, July 24th, 2008


Thanks to Ray B. for this chuckle. I know it is politically incorrect but kinda’ right on!
(click on image for a close up)

Dove - Evolution Commercial

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

This is a repeat from an early post but it is still so good…in case you’ve never seen it. If you have a teenage daughter (or son) this is a video for them to see too. The images we are exposed to are not reality. Enjoy!

Michael Savage-showman or Idiot?

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008


The news buzz of the day concerns the conservative radio talk show jock, Michael Savage, and the outraged parents who are petitioning for his firing. This “shock jock” personality used his show to rant about something he has zero knowledge.

Michael Savage said autism is a “fraud and a racket” and that “in 99 percent of the cases, it’s a brat who hasn’t been told to cut the act out. That’s what autism is. What do you mean they scream and they’re silent? They don’t have a father around to tell them, ‘Don’t act like a moron. You’ll get nowhere in life. Stop acting like a putz. Straighten up. Act like a man. Don’t sit there crying and screaming, idiot.’” In defending his comments he went on to say, “It’s an over diagnosed medical condition. In my readings, there is no definitive medical diagnosis for autism.”

When challenged further, he defended his comments by lashing out at the medical community and lambasted “greedy doctors who use children as profit centers by a greedy, corrupt medical/pharmaceutical establishment….”

Sorry, Michael Savage. You’ve really gone too far this time with your hateful “Savage Nation”. You may know nothing about autism, but as a physician I know far too much. It is a spectrum of brain dysfunction that can be truly heartbreaking for parents and families. It has nothing to do with spoiled children or neglectful parents and your ignorance would be laughable if millions of people didn’t hear you on the radio.

Michael Savage is first a showman. He is so proud of his comments that he is keeping the debate going by continuing the accusations against the medical establishment. And why not? His name is in the news and controversy is like money in the bank for him.

Michael Savage, you owe millions of parents, children and doctors an apology and if I were your boss, I WOULD fire you for just being plain stupid.

Diet Wars - Low Carb Wins

Friday, July 18th, 2008


The confusion about which diet is best for health and weight maintenance has plagued us for decades. The New England Journal of Medicine reported today that the Mediterranean and low carbohydrate diets are the way to go. Here were the parameters:

Low Fat Diet - based on the American Heart Association with no more than 35% of calories from fat. The participants were counseled to consume low fat grains, vegies, fruits and legumes and to limit additional fats, sweets and high-fat snacks. Calorie restriction of 1500/day for women and 1800/day for men.

Mediterranean Diet- Rich in vegies and low in red meat with poultry and fish replacing beef and lamb. No more than 35% of calories from fat and the main sources of added fat were olive oil and 5-7 nuts a day. Calorie restriction of 1500/day for women and 1800/day for men.

Low-Carbohydrate Diet- 20g of carbs/day for 2 months with a gradual increase to a max of 120g a day. The intakes of total calories, protein and fat were not limited but the participants were counseled to choose vegetarian sources of fat and protein with no trans fat. (Based on Atkins diet)

All the groups lost weight but the low carb and Mediterranean diet groups lost the most. All groups decreased their waist circumference and blood pressure.

The low-carb group had the best lipid profiles (cholesterol and triglycerides) and the largest decrease in these levels.

C-reactive protein decreased the most in the Mediterranean diet and low carb groups.

The Mediterranean diet group had the best improvement with diabetes. The low fat group increased their fasting glucose levels. The low carbohydrate group had the best improvement in glycated hemoglobin (a marker for blood sugar control).

The liver tests were the same in all groups.

So the take home message is that calorie restriction works for weight loss (surprise) but the low carb and Mediterranean diets had beneficial metabolic effects beyond weight loss. Weight loss was the same with the low carb group without restricting calories!

It looks like the “Atkins Diet” might be making a comeback based on this well controlled trial.

Weight Loss with a Low-Carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or Low-Fat Diet

Thursday, July 17th, 2008

The dramatic increase in obesity worldwide remains challenging and underscores the urgent need to test the effectiveness and safety of several widely used weight-loss diets.1,2,3 Low-carbohydrate, high-protein, high-fat diets (referred to as low-carbohydrate diets) have been compared with low-fat, energy-restricted diets.4,5,6,7,8,9 A meta-analysis of five trials with 447 participants10 and a recent 1-year trial involving 311 obese women4 suggested that a low-carbohydrate diet is a feasible alternative to a low-fat diet for producing weight loss and may have favorable metabolic effects. However, longer-term studies are lacking.4,10 A Mediterranean diet with a moderate amount of fat and a high proportion of monounsaturated fat provides cardiovascular benefits.11 A recent review citing several trials12 included a few that suggested that the Mediterranean diet was beneficial for weight loss.13,14 However, this positive effect has not been conclusively demonstrated.

In this 2-year dietary-intervention study, we found that the Mediterranean and low-carbohydrate diets are effective alternatives to the low-fat diet for weight loss and appear to be just as safe as the low-fat diet. In addition to producing weight loss in this moderately obese group of participants, the low-carbohydrate and Mediterranean diets had some beneficial metabolic effects, a result suggesting that these dietary strategies might be considered in clinical practice and that diets might be individualized according to personal preferences and metabolic needs. The similar caloric deficit achieved in all diet groups suggests that a low-carbohydrate, non–restricted-calorie diet may be optimal for those who will not follow a restricted-calorie dietary regimen. The increasing improvement in levels of some biomarkers over time up to the 24-month point, despite the achievement of maximum weight loss by 6 months, suggests that a diet with a healthful composition has benefits beyond weight reduction.

The present study has several limitations. We enrolled few women; however, we observed a significant interaction between the effects of diet group and sex on weight loss (women tended to lose more weight on the Mediterranean diet), and this difference between men and women was also reflected in the changes in leptin levels. This possible sex-specific difference should be explored in further studies. The data from the few participants with diabetes are of interest, but we recognize that measurement of HOMA-IR is not an optimal method to assess insulin resistance among persons with diabetes. We relied on self-reported dietary intake, but we validated the dietary assessment in two different dietary-assessment tools and used electronic questionnaires to minimize the amount of missing data. Finally, one might argue that the unique nature of the workplace in this study, which permitted a closely monitored dietary intervention for a period of 2 years, makes it difficult to generalize the results to other free-living populations. However, we believe that similar strategies to maintain adherence could be applied elsewhere.

The strengths of the study include the one-phase design, in which all participants started simultaneously; the relatively long duration of the study; the large study-group size; and the high rate of adherence. The monthly measurements of weight permitted a better understanding of the weight-loss trajectory than was the case in previous studies.

We observed two phases of weight change: initial weight loss and weight maintenance. The maximum weight reduction was achieved during the first 6 months; this period was followed by the maintenance phase of partial rebound and a plateau. Among all diet groups, weight loss was greater for those who completed the 24-month study than for those who did not. Even moderate weight loss has health benefits, and our findings suggest benefits of behavioral approaches that yield weight losses similar to those obtained with pharmacotherapy.29

We distinguished between changes in levels of biomarkers (leptin, adiponectin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) that are apparently related to loss of adipose tissue and changes in biomarkers (triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, glucose, and insulin) that apparently reflect, in part, the effects of specific diet composition. The changes we observed in levels of adiponectin and leptin,30 which were consistent in all groups, reflect loss of weight. Consumption of monounsaturated fats is thought to improve insulin sensitivity,14,31,32 an effect that may explain the favorable effect of the Mediterranean diet on glucose and insulin levels. The results imply that dietary composition modifies metabolic biomarkers in addition to leading to weight loss. Our results suggest that health care professionals might consider more than one dietary approach, according to individual preferences and metabolic needs, as long as the effort is sustained.

This trial also suggests a model that might be applied more broadly in the workplace. As Okie recently suggested,33 using the employer as a health coach could be a cost-effective way to improve health. The model of intervention with the use of dietary group sessions, spousal support, food labels, and monthly weighing in the workplace within the framework of a health promotion campaign might yield weight reduction and long-term health benefits.