Across 37 nearby dwarf galaxies, the share of stellar oxygen still in the galaxy runs from 4% to 25% (mean about 11%), well below what three cosmological simulations predict, though no one has yet measured where the rest went.

Peer reviewed · Observational census · Retention figures are estimates

Astronomers have added up the oxygen in 37 nearby dwarf galaxies and found most of it missing. Kristen McQuinn of Rutgers University and co-authors, in The Astrophysical Journal on 2 November 2026, estimate that each galaxy still holds 4% to 25% of the oxygen its stars have made, about 11% on average. Simulations predict more. The catch: the team did not find the lost oxygen, and the supernova-driven winds they favour as the cause are inferred from the numbers, not observed directly.

What you need to know

  • Finding: The 37 galaxies keep 4% to 25% of the oxygen their stars produced (mean 10.7%), and 29 of them keep 15% or less.
  • Method: Hubble star counts gave each galaxy’s star-formation history; infrared light, radio gas maps and oxygen emission lines gave the rest of the budget.
  • Source: McQuinn et al., The Astrophysical Journal 1011, 158, open access, published 2 November 2026.
  • Why it matters: Simulations that match other galaxy properties predict a larger oxygen share kept than these galaxies hold, and the authors suggest galactic winds remove oxygen more effectively than current models assume.
  • Limitation: “Oxygen produced” rests on an assumed yield and stellar-mass estimate, and the destination of the missing oxygen is unmeasured.

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summary for the GLOW dwarf-galaxy oxygen census
ItemAssessment
Evidence statusPeer reviewed; observational census of 37 galaxies; retention values are modelled estimates.
Primary sourceMcQuinn K.B.W. et al., “GLOW. II. A Census of Oxygen in Low-mass Galaxies”, The Astrophysical Journal 1011, 158, published 2 November 2026, DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ae93a6. SciQuest read the open-access full text; preprint: arXiv:2608.07665.
Evidence strengthModerate. The sample is large for galaxies this close, and Hubble resolves their individual stars, but the “oxygen made” figure depends on an assumed yield (0.010) and a mass-to-light ratio, and most galaxies are in sparse environments.
Principal limitationThe census shows oxygen is missing; it does not show where it went or prove what pushed it out.
Coverage at a glance2 independent news outlets with their own writing (Sci.News, Earth.com) plus 2 institutional releases (NASA, Rutgers), as of 5 November 2026, 12:40 UTC. Reposts of the NASA release were not counted.

Sources: the paper and a SciQuest search of coverage on the observation date. Coverage count is not evidence the result is correct.

Is this a big deal?

A solid, careful measurement rather than a surprise discovery. It puts a number on a long-suspected leak and shows that leading simulations leak too little. The open question of where the oxygen went is the part to watch.

What scientists found

Think of a bank statement. Total earnings are known, but the balance is small. For the 37 galaxies, the “earnings” are the oxygen their stars forged and the “balance” is the oxygen now sitting in stars, gas and dust. The balance averages 10.7% of the earnings (standard deviation 5.1 percentage points), with galaxies ranging from about 3.8% to 24.8%. The analogy breaks at one point: a bank knows where money went, and here the destination is unknown.

Nearly all the oxygen that remains is in gas, not in stars. Galaxies more than 1 megaparsec (about 3.3 million light-years) from a large neighbour of more than a billion Suns in stellar mass all kept less than 15%. Closer in, the numbers scatter widely, but the authors call that environment trend tentative because the sample is small and mostly isolated galaxies.

Dwarf galaxies keep about 11% of the oxygen their stars made GLOW census of 37 nearby gas-rich dwarf galaxies (stellar mass about 3 million to 3 billion Suns), measured with Hubble star counts plus gas data The oxygen budget (average galaxy) Every 100 units of oxygen made by past stars: Made by stars: 100 Today 11 kept 89 missing where it wentis not measured range across galaxies: 4 to 25 Nearly all the kept oxygen sits in gas, not stars or dust. Share of oxygen kept, by galaxy size Vertical axis: percent of produced oxygen retained. Horizontal axis: stellar mass, log scale. 0 10 20 30 40 100 thousand 10 million 1 billion 100 billion stellar mass (Suns) GLOW: 37 galaxies band: 4 to 25% mean line: 11% Leo P:about 5% about 20% at 1 billion Suns (earlier SDSS-based estimate) M31 (Andromeda): 38% (35 of the 38 in stars) Three simulations predict more oxygen kept than observed (FIRE-2: about 2 to 4 times more). Source: McQuinn et al., The Astrophysical Journal 1011, 158 (published 2 Nov 2026), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae93a6. Retention = oxygen now in stars, gas and dust divided by oxygen made by past stars (an estimate, using yield 0.010). Leo P and M31 values are literature comparisons in the paper. SciQuest original graphic.
Left: the average oxygen budget per 100 units made by stars. Right: the share kept at different galaxy masses, with the GLOW sample as the shaded band; Leo P, the earlier estimate near 1 billion Suns, and M31 are literature comparisons quoted in the paper. Retention values are estimates. SciQuest original graphic based on McQuinn et al., The Astrophysical Journal (2026).

How they found it

The 37 galaxies are within about 6 megaparsecs (roughly 20 million light-years), close enough for Hubble to pick out individual stars, which most dwarf galaxies are too far away to allow. Brightness and colour of those stars let the team reconstruct when each galaxy formed its stars and how its chemistry changed.

Three more measurements complete the budget. Infrared light from the Spitzer Space Telescope gives each galaxy’s stellar mass. Radio telescopes (the Very Large Array and the Australia Telescope Compact Array) map the hydrogen gas. Oxygen’s emission lines in glowing gas clouds give its abundance in the gas, and a dust model accounts for oxygen locked in grains.

Dividing what is there by what stars should have made gives “retention”. For the denominator, the team uses an oxygen yield of 0.010 and a return fraction of about 0.43. Together these mean each solar mass of stars alive today implies about 0.018 solar masses of oxygen made in total.

Worked example: one hypothetical galaxy

SciQuest calculation, not a galaxy from the paper. Take a galaxy with 108 Suns of stars. Oxygen made is 0.01 ÷ (1 − 0.433) × 108 ≈ 1.8 million solar masses. At the 11% average, about 190,000 solar masses remain and about 1.6 million are missing. The missing oxygen is about eight times what the galaxy still holds (89 ÷ 11).

Why it matters to you

Nothing here changes daily life. The oxygen in air and water was made in stars, and this work tracks how much of it small galaxies hold onto and how much they send into intergalactic space. Rutgers’ release quotes McQuinn on why oxygen: “Oxygen is one of the primary elements formed by stars.” For the star side of the story, see our guide to the life cycle of a star.

What the evidence does not show

The study does not locate the missing oxygen. Earlier measurements of ionised oxygen in the gas halos around dwarf galaxies, quoted in the paper, cover roughly 1% to 7% of the oxygen produced. After a correction for ionisation, the paper puts the halo’s possible share at roughly 5% to 35%. Most oxygen is therefore still unaccounted for, and whether it has left for the space between galaxies is open.

The yield matters too. A higher published yield of 0.015 would push the retention figures lower still, and the choice of stellar-evolution model shifts values modestly.

How this fits what we already knew

Oxygen loss from galaxies is not a new idea. The paper compares its numbers with Leo P, a tiny galaxy of about 200,000 Suns that keeps roughly 5%, and with the Andromeda galaxy (M31), which keeps about 38%, mostly in its stars. A 2014 study of Milky Way-like galaxies, cited in Rutgers’ release, found much of their oxygen had also left the main body. Retention rises with galaxy mass, and the GLOW galaxies sit below an earlier estimate of roughly 20% near 1 billion Suns.

Against simulations the picture is clear. The FIRE-2 simulations keep two to four times more oxygen than observed across this mass range. A second set, by Christensen and colleagues, comes closest, mostly within a factor of two but still high, and a third, by Piacitelli and colleagues, predicts a few times more. All three reproduce the observed link between galaxy mass and metal content, so the mismatch lies in how much oxygen they keep.

Outside views and the authors’ interpretation

SciQuest has not interviewed an independent researcher and found no on-record outside comment yet. The authors’ own view, from the Rutgers release, is that galactic winds do the removing. Grace Telford of the University of Utah, a co-investigator, said “you need energy from massive stars and supernova explosions to drive material out of the host galaxies.” The paper also fits a simple galaxy-regulator model, which favours winds that weaken as galaxies grow and carry gas about twice as metal-rich as the galaxy’s own, together with roughly 40% suppression of fresh gas accretion. That is a model fit, not a direct measurement.

How other headlines framed it

  • NASA framed it as a case of missing oxygen, led by Hubble.
  • Rutgers put the emphasis on the cycle: stars make oxygen, small galaxies lose most of it.
  • Sci.News gave the figure, about a tenth retained, in its headline.
  • Earth.com stressed that something strange is missing, a more mysterious tone than the paper’s measured one.

One small inconsistency: Rutgers puts the galaxies within 22 million light-years, while the paper’s cut is 6 megaparsecs, about 20 million. SciQuest uses the paper.

What happens next

McQuinn plans to use NASA’s Roman Space Telescope, under an approved program, to find smaller, fainter dwarf galaxies over a large area of sky, then study them with Hubble and the James Webb Space Telescope. Telford plans to use Hubble to study individual massive stars in some GLOW galaxies. The authors also call for a larger sample to test the environment trend. For a sense of how astronomers read galaxy history from starlight, see our report on Gaia star ages and the Milky Way’s disk.

In one sentence

Nearby dwarf galaxies appear to hold only about a tenth of the oxygen their stars forged, simulations expect more, and where the rest went remains to be measured.

Quick check: did it click?
  1. What share of produced oxygen do the 37 galaxies keep on average? About 11% (range 4% to 25%).
  2. Did the study find where the missing oxygen went? No. It may be in the galaxies’ halos or in intergalactic space, and that is unresolved.

Read next

Sources and disclosure

  1. McQuinn K.B.W., Telford O.G., Kravtsov A.V., Burchett J., Cohen R., Hunter L., Skillman E.D., Roman-Duval J., Berg D.A., Cannon J.M., Chisholm J., Dalcanton J.J., Dolphin A.E., van Zee L., Williams B. “GLOW. II. A Census of Oxygen in Low-mass Galaxies.” The Astrophysical Journal 1011, 158 (2026). doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae93a6. Preprint: arXiv:2608.07665.
  2. NASA, “NASA’s Hubble Uncovers Case of Missing Oxygen in Nearby Dwarf Galaxies,” 2 November 2026: science.nasa.gov.
  3. Rutgers University news, 2 November 2026: Stars make oxygen; small galaxies lose most of it.
  4. Coverage read for framing: Sci.News, Earth.com (2 and 3 November 2026).

Disclosure: This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above, including the paper’s open-access full text. Calculations by SciQuest: 1 megaparsec ≈ 3.26 million light-years, so 6 Mpc ≈ 20 million light-years; oxygen made per unit of present stellar mass = 0.01 ÷ (1 − 0.433) ≈ 0.0176; hypothetical 108-Sun galaxy: 1.76 million solar masses made, 11% kept ≈ 190,000, missing ≈ 1.57 million. The graphic is a SciQuest original built from the paper’s reported values. Spotted an error? See our corrections policy.


Discover more from SciQuest

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.