Latest from SciQuestEvidence-led science

Great Unconformity: a vanished cliff may explain the Grand Canyon’s missing billion years

A Geology paper models a kilometre-high cliff formed as Rodinia broke apart about 800–750 million years ago, estimating it stripped up to 8 km of rock near its edge but 2 km or less some 200 km away.

What it does not show The escarpment no longer exists; its size, position and erosion are reconstructed, and competing glacial and tectonic explanations remain

Concept illustration of an atomic matter wave splitting into held and freely falling paths above an atom chip

Falling Quantum Atoms Pass a New Test of Einstein’s Gravity

An atom-chip experiment measured the quantum phase of freely falling rubidium atoms and found behavior consistent with Einstein’s equivalence principle.

Primary sourcesResearch and official data linked in context
Evidence calibratedObservation, interpretation and speculation separated
Corrections welcomeTransparent updates and a direct reporting channel

Discover

Explore by field and evidence

Choose the kind of evidence you want to read. Labels describe the study type, not whether a finding is true.

Space

Planets, moons, stars and black holes, with the mission data behind each number.

All space stories

Physics

Gravity, quantum behaviour and fundamental forces, with the calculations shown.

All physics stories

Biology

Genes, evolution and living systems, with study design and sample sizes made clear.

All biology stories

Health

Medical research read carefully: mouse, cell and human evidence kept distinct.

All health stories

Earth

Climate, geology and oceans, traced back to measurements and official records.

Selected reading

More from SciQuest

Clear explanations of what scientists found, how they know and what remains uncertain.

Browse all stories

How SciQuest reports

Interesting science is stronger when readers can inspect the evidence.

Our editorial standard requires every substantive story to identify what was observed, how it was measured, what researchers infer and what remains uncertain.

Read our editorial standards
  1. 01
    Find the primary evidence

    Start with the paper, dataset, mission record or official technical source.

  2. 02
    Test the central claim

    Check the method, numbers, scope, uncertainty and alternative explanations.

  3. 03
    Explain without inflating

    Make the significance clear while preserving limits and scientific context.

Start here

Essential explainers

Durable answers with the numbers, the method and the caveats in one place.

Can Identical Twins Have The Same DNA?

The physical similarities and shared genetic origins of identical twins have always engrossed scientists and the public. They are born from a…

Aging Occurs In Two Bursts Of Human Life

According to Stanford Medicine research humans do not experience aging in a steady cycle of linear changes, instead we experience bursts of…