Latest from SciQuestEvidence-led science

White dwarf’s double debris disc may hide two surviving planetary bodies

A white dwarf has two separate gas rings. Astronomers propose two surviving planetary bodies, up to Pluto-sized, make the gas. Neither body has been seen.

What it does not show One star; rings are modelled from line shapes and the planetary bodies have not been observed

Primary sourcesResearch and official data linked in context
Evidence calibratedObservation, interpretation and speculation separated
Corrections welcomeTransparent updates and a direct reporting channel

Discover

Explore by field and evidence

Choose the kind of evidence you want to read. Labels describe the study type, not whether a finding is true.

Space

Planets, moons, stars and black holes, with the mission data behind each number.

All space stories

Physics

Gravity, quantum behaviour and fundamental forces, with the calculations shown.

Biology

Genes, evolution and living systems, with study design and sample sizes made clear.

All biology stories

Health

Medical research read carefully: mouse, cell and human evidence kept distinct.

All health stories

Astronomy

What telescopes observe, how astronomers measure it and what remains uncertain.

All astronomy stories

Selected reading

More from SciQuest

Clear explanations of what scientists found, how they know and what remains uncertain.

Diagram placing lab-grown Asgard archaea strains HC1 and SC1 beside eukaryotes on the family tree, and comparing a simple HC1 cell with protrusions to a eukaryotic cell with nucleus and mitochondria

Lab-grown Asgard archaea closest to eukaryotes are simple inside

Two newly cultured Heimdallarchaeia, the closest known archaeal relatives of eukaryotes, lack internal membranes. What that means for how complex cells began.

Browse all stories

How SciQuest reports

Interesting science is stronger when readers can inspect the evidence.

Our editorial standard requires every substantive story to identify what was observed, how it was measured, what researchers infer and what remains uncertain.

Read our editorial standards
  1. 01
    Find the primary evidence

    Start with the paper, dataset, mission record or official technical source.

  2. 02
    Test the central claim

    Check the method, numbers, scope, uncertainty and alternative explanations.

  3. 03
    Explain without inflating

    Make the significance clear while preserving limits and scientific context.

Start here

Essential explainers

Durable answers with the numbers, the method and the caveats in one place.