Hydrogen chloride turned up in the cold season above fresh fissures on the volcano Alba Mons, at about 2 parts per billion, and the team behind the finding proposes it seeps from magma underground, though no eruption has ever been seen on Mars.

Peer reviewed · Orbital observations · Proposed interpretation

Europe’s ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter has caught hydrogen chloride (HCl) gas in a season and place where it should not be: over fresh, narrow fissures on the flanks of the Martian volcano Alba Mons in early northern summer. A team led by Alexander Trokhimovskiy of the Space Research Institute in Moscow reports in Science Advances that the detections are best explained by magma still active beneath the surface. That would mean Mars is not volcanically dead. The catch: it is an interpretation of trace gas readings, and nobody has seen an eruption or a new lava flow.

What you need to know

  • Finding: HCl appeared during Mars’s cold aphelion season only in the Alba Mons region, recurring in the same season and place, at about 2 parts per billion by volume.
  • Method: The orbiter’s Atmospheric Chemistry Suite (ACS) spectrometers measured the gas; its CaSSIS camera then imaged fresh fissures under 1 metre wide below the detections.
  • Source: Trokhimovskiy, Mège, Korablev and 18 co-authors, Science Advances 12, eaeb9422, published 4 November 2026.
  • Why it matters: Present-day magma would make Mars a geologically living planet and would point to places where heat and gas reach the surface.
  • Limitation: The magma is inferred, not observed; the authors call the HCl a “potential signature,” and sulphur dioxide, a classic eruption gas, has still not been detected.

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summary for the Alba Mons hydrogen chloride study
ItemAssessment
Evidence statusPeer reviewed. Remote-sensing observations from orbit plus a proposed interpretation (magmatic seepage).
Primary sourceTrokhimovskiy A., Mège D., Korablev O. et al. “Enigmatic HCl detections as a potential signature of igneous activity on Mars”, Science Advances 12(45), eaeb9422, published online 4 November 2026 (issue dated 6 November), DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aeb9422. SciQuest read the abstract via Crossref and checked it against the ESA release and an ESA interview with co-author Daniel Mège. The full text was blocked by the publisher’s bot check.
Evidence strengthLimited to moderate. The gas detections are direct measurements and repeat in the same place and season, but the link to magma is an inference from where and when the gas appears, and no second volcanic gas has been found.
Principal limitationNo eruption, lava flow or magma body has been observed; magmatic seepage is the authors’ best explanation, not a measurement.
Coverage at a glance4 distinct outlets with their own reporting (Reuters, Space.com, BBC Sky at Night Magazine, Sci.News) as of 8 November 2026, 09:05 UTC. Not counted: the ESA and AAAS releases themselves, reposts of them (EurekAlert, ScienceDaily), radio-station copies of the Reuters story, and aggregators. The count is not evidence the interpretation is correct.

Sources: the paper’s abstract (Crossref), ESA news and blog (4 to 5 November 2026), and a SciQuest search of coverage on the observation date.

Is this a big deal?

It is a strong hint, not proof. If it holds up, it would be the first chemical sign of magma active on Mars today, which planetary scientists have long suspected but could not show. For now it rests on one gas, at trace levels, over one region, and on the team’s reasoning about where that gas comes from.

What scientists found

Hydrogen chloride is not new on Mars. The same orbiter’s ACS instrument first reported it in 2021, after spotting it during the 2018 global dust storm. That HCl appeared in both hemispheres at once, in the warm dusty season near perihelion, when Mars is closest to the Sun. ESA explained it then as chemistry between salty dust and water vapour, not volcanoes. (For the rest of the air, see our guide to the atmosphere of Mars.)

The new paper reports something different. During the cold aphelion season, when Mars is farthest from the Sun, HCl showed up isolated in the Alba Mons region. ESA describes it as “always in the same season and at the same place”: early northern summer, above volcanic fissures. Mège puts the concentration “of the order of two parts per billion by volume.” That is two molecules of HCl in every billion molecules of air.

Hydrogen chloride on Mars: two seasons, two explanations Most HCl appears in the dusty season near perihelion. The new paper reports HCl in the cold aphelion season, only near Alba Mons. Where Mars is when HCl shows up Sun Perihelion 206.65 million km from the Sun Northern winter, dusty season OBSERVED since 2018: HCl in both hemispheres at once. 2021 explanation: salty dust + water vapour chemistry. Aphelion 249.26 million km Near northern summer REPORTED 2026: HCl in the cold season, isolated over Alba Mons, same season, same place. Sunlight at perihelion is about 1.45 times that at aphelion (249.26 / 206.65, squared). Orbit drawn schematically, not to scale. The proposed source at Alba Mons Solid labels = observed. Dashed outlines = proposed by the authors. ACS spectrometers on the Trace Gas Orbiter detect HCl, about 2 parts per billion Early summer: ice sublimates and gas may escape (proposed) Fresh fissures imaged by CaSSIS (observed) Under 1 m wide, some hundreds of metres long White plug: winter ice may seal the fissures at down to about -120 °C (proposed) Dashed blue: gas pathway from depth (proposed) Magma body (inferred, not seen) Not observed: an eruption or a new lava flow. Magmatic seepage is the authors’ best explanation, not a measurement. Sources: Trokhimovskiy et al., Science Advances 12, eaeb9422 (2026), abstract; ESA news and ESA blog, 4-5 Nov 2026; ESA 2021 HCl release; NASA Mars fact sheet. Diagram is schematic; depths and sizes are not to scale. SciQuest original graphic.
Left: most Martian HCl appears near perihelion and was explained in 2021 by dust and water chemistry; the new detections come near aphelion and only over Alba Mons. Right: the authors’ proposed pathway, with what was observed (gas, fissures) separated from what is inferred (ice seal, magma). Sunlight ratio calculated by SciQuest from NASA orbital distances. SciQuest original graphic based on Trokhimovskiy et al., Science Advances (2026), ESA and NASA.

How they found it

The ACS team saw the odd HCl in the atmosphere first. Kevin Olsen of the University of Oxford, a co-author, told Mège that the team suspected a geological source for some detections, according to the ESA blog. Mège, a geologist at the Space Research Centre of the Polish Academy of Sciences, looked at where the gas sat. Judging from the spatial pattern, “it became instantly obvious to me that there was something volcanic behind it, but it had to be demonstrated,” he told ESA.

Demonstrating it took two kinds of evidence. ACS, a set of infrared spectrometers, measured gas that was localised in space and time, just after winter frost had sublimated. The orbiter’s camera, CaSSIS, then imaged the ground below and found fresh, narrow fissures, under 1 metre wide according to the abstract and in some cases hundreds of metres long, with colour changes on the surface around them. One ESA example image, taken on 3 February 2023, covers about 20 by 20 kilometres centred near 64.6°N, 274.4°E on the volcano’s northern flanks.

The proposed mechanism works a bit like a frozen bottle cap. In winter, at temperatures down to about −120 °C, ice may block the fissures. As the ice turns straight to vapour in early summer, gas from below escapes, much as from fumaroles (volcanic gas vents) on Earth. The analogy breaks down in one way: nobody has measured pressure building under the ice. The pale deposits around the cracks may be minerals left by the gas, but that too is an interpretation.

“A huge part of the work consisted of examining all the possible chemical processes going on in the martian atmosphere,” Mège said in the ESA release. The team concluded that magmatic seepage was the most likely source.

Why it matters to you

This won’t change anything for anyone on Earth this year. It matters for the wonder question of whether Mars is a dead world or a sleeping one, and for where future missions might look. Mège suggests the seeping fissures would be a sensible place to search for microbial life. His reasoning is conditional: if hydrothermal systems are active there, they could offer energy and shelter to microorganisms. That is speculation, and he notes HCl itself is not a friendly gas for living things.

What the evidence does not show

It does not show an eruption. No new lava flows or eruptions have ever been observed on Mars, ESA notes, and the paper’s own abstract says sulphur dioxide (SO2), the gas that would testify to eruptive activity, remains undetected. The case for magma rests on HCl alone.

It does not rule out every other source. ESA’s 2021 work tied seasonal HCl to dust and water chemistry, and that explanation still stands for the widespread warm-season gas; the new abstract attributes those detections to “aerosol-atmospheric sources.” Mège also notes that the detections sit at fairly high latitude, where freezing and thawing of the upper permafrost can trap and release gases with the seasons. SciQuest could not read which atmospheric explanations the team tested and rejected, or how much gas they estimate is escaping, because the full paper was not accessible.

How this fits what we already knew

Mars has the largest volcanoes in the Solar System, and some appear to have been active within the last few million years, according to ESA. Seismometers have recorded marsquakes, and other studies have pointed to a still-warm interior, such as the gravity-based estimate of a hotter mantle beneath Mars’s southern highlands. What was missing was a gas sign of magma today. Earlier spacecraft instruments were not sensitive enough to find volcanic gases at trace levels, Mège told ESA’s blog.

The new result also revisits a 2021 conclusion. Back then, HCl appeared in distant places at the same time and without other volcanic gases, so ESA ruled out volcanoes for that gas. The Alba Mons detections are the opposite pattern: tied to one place, in an unexpected season.

Independent view

SciQuest found no comment from an independent researcher in the coverage published by 8 November 2026, and we have not yet interviewed one. Every voice quoted so far, including ESA’s Trace Gas Orbiter project scientist Colin Wilson, who said “These findings may prove to be TGO’s greatest success yet,” belongs to the study team or to ESA, which runs the mission.

How other headlines framed it

  • ESA: framed it as “hints” of volcanic activity, with a Mars that may be sleeping rather than dead.
  • ScienceDaily (ESA text): headlined a Mars that may still be “volcanically alive,” while its body says the findings do not establish current eruptions.
  • Reuters (via KFGO): led with a pungent gas hinting at ongoing volcanism, and added the life angle.
  • Space.com: said recent volcanic activity “reveals” Mars is sleeping, firmer wording than the paper’s “potential signature.”
  • BBC Sky at Night Magazine: stressed signs of activity and a clue for the search for life, with hedges in the body.

What happens next

Two things would firm this up. If ACS keeps finding HCl over the same fissures each early summer, the pattern gets harder to explain away. A detection of sulphur dioxide or another magmatic gas at the same spot would strengthen the case far more. For a sense of how far those missions must travel, see how far Mars is from Earth.

In one sentence

Hydrogen chloride that keeps appearing over fresh cracks on Alba Mons in the cold season may be leaking from magma underground, which would mean Mars still has a living volcanic system, but no eruption or second volcanic gas has been seen yet.

Quick check: did it click?
  1. Was hydrogen chloride already known on Mars? Yes. The same orbiter reported it in 2021, mostly in the warm dusty season, and it was explained by dust and water chemistry.
  2. What makes the Alba Mons detections different? They come in the cold aphelion season, only in one region, above fresh fissures.
  3. Has anyone seen a Martian volcano erupt? No. The magma is inferred from the gas, not observed.

Read next

Sources and disclosure

  1. Trokhimovskiy A., Mège D., Korablev O., Olsen K.S., Fedorova A.A., Taysum B., Tesson P.-A., Luginin M., Montmessin F. et al. (21 authors). “Enigmatic HCl detections as a potential signature of igneous activity on Mars.” Science Advances 12(45), eaeb9422 (2026). doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeb9422. Abstract and author list read via Crossref.
  2. ESA, “European orbiter detects hints of volcanic activity on Mars,” 5 November 2026: esa.int (also issued 4 November via EurekAlert).
  3. ESA “To Mars and back” blog, “Geological intuition for Mars,” interview with Daniel Mège, 4 November 2026: blogs.esa.int.
  4. AAAS, Science Advances press release, 4 November 2026: EurekAlert.
  5. ESA, “ExoMars discovers new gas and traces water loss on Mars,” 10 February 2021 (Korablev et al., Science Advances 7, eabe4386): esa.int.
  6. NASA, Mars Fact Sheet (perihelion 206.65 and aphelion 249.26 million km): nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov.

Disclosure: This article was drafted with AI assistance and checked against the sources above. The full paper was blocked by the publisher’s bot check, so SciQuest relied on the abstract and on ESA’s release and co-author interview; figures reported elsewhere that we could not trace to those sources were left out. Calculation by SciQuest: (249.26 ÷ 206.65)² ≈ 1.45, so Mars gets about 45% more sunlight at perihelion than at aphelion. The graphic is a SciQuest original. Spotted an error? See our corrections policy.


Discover more from SciQuest

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.